Journal Reviews Ex-MIT Professor's Papers 杂志重新核查前MIT教授的论文Science Journal Reviews Papers by Ex-MIT Professor Who Was Fired for Allegedly Fabricating Data 科学杂志重新核前麻省理工大学教授的论文, 该教授被指控编造实验数据而遭解雇
一项科学杂志的出版商正在调查被解职的麻省理工大学生物教授所提交论文的准确性, 这位教授承认了捏造研究数据. Luk Van Parijs 在加州理工大学完成博士后工作前的1998到1999年之间,向免疫学杂志递交的3篇论文,此后成为麻省理工学院的副教授,从事癌症研究.
欺诈的指控是性质十分严重的罪行, 杂志会严肃对待此事. 今年35岁的Van Parijs周三被解雇,因为承认了在论文,一些手稿和经费申请报告中捏造和篡改数据, 当有同事向MIT管理者汇报了该指控, 从2004年8月起他一直在休假.
Van Parijs现在不便对此事发表评论.
周五新科学家杂志报道: 在Van Parijs 递交的至少3篇论文中, 据他宣称有不同结果的数据中,有难以说清的相似性. 其中一篇是发表在1998年免疫学杂志上.
麻省理工学院称: 现在还没有证据,他的合作作者和研究小组的同事在这项不端行为的指控中有牵连.
Cal Tech 正在调查1998-2000年Van Parijs 在做学生时的研究报告. Van Parijs和 Cal Tech 校长David Baltimore ,1975年病毒生物学诺贝尔奖获得者,一起共过事.
David Baltimore 还没有明确对Van Parijs 在Cal Tech写的2篇免疫学论文的怀疑, 但学校会核查更多的研究数据.
BOSTON - The publisher of a scientific journal is investigating the accuracy of several papers written by a biology professor who was fired by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for allegedly fabricating research data.
一项科学杂志的出版商正在调查被解职的麻省理工大学生物教授所提交论文的准确性, 这位教授承认了捏造研究数据.
Luk Van Parijs wrote three papers for the journal Immunity in 1998 and 1999, before he finished his postdoctoral work at the California Institute of Technology and became an associate professor in MIT's Center for Cancer Research.
Luk Van Parijs 在加州理工大学完成博士后工作前的1998到1999年之间,向免疫学杂志递交的3篇论文,此后成为麻省理工学院的副教授,从事癌症研究.
"The allegation of fraud is a very serious offense," said Lynne Herndon, president and CEO of Cell Press, which publishes the Cambridge-based journal. "This is something we take very seriously, as do all scientific journals."
欺诈的指控是性质十分严重的罪行, 杂志会严肃对待此事.
MIT says Van Parijs, 35, who was fired Wednesday, has admitted fabricating and falsifying data in a paper, several manuscripts and grant applications. He had been on leave since August 2004, when a group of colleagues reported the allegations to MIT administrators.
今年35岁的Van Parijs周三被解雇,因为承认了在论文,一些手稿和经费申请报告中捏造和篡改数据, 当有同事向MIT管理者汇报了该指控, 从2004年8月起他一直在休假.
A woman who answered the telephone Saturday for a listing for Van Parijs said he was not available for comment.
Van Parijs现在不便对此事发表评论.
New Scientist magazine reported Friday it had uncovered "uncanny similarities between supposedly different results" that Van Parijs presented in at least three papers. One of those papers was published by Immunity in 1998, the magazine reported.
周五新科学家杂志报道: 在Van Parijs 递交的至少3篇论文中, 据他宣称有不同结果的数据中,有难以说清的相似性. 其中一篇是发表在1998年免疫学杂志上.
MIT said its investigation found no evidence that his co-authors or other members of his research group were involved in the alleged misconduct.
麻省理工学院称: 现在还没有证据,他的合作作者和研究小组的同事在这项不端行为的指控中有牵连.
Cal Tech is investigating research that Van Parijs conducted while he was a student there from 1998 to 2000. Van Parijs worked with Cal Tech President David Baltimore, who won a Nobel Prize in 1975 for research on the basic biology of viruses.
Cal Tech 正在调查1998-2000年Van Parijs 在做学生时的研究报告. Van Parijs和 Cal Tech 校长David Baltimore ,1975年病毒生物学诺贝尔奖获得者,一起共过事.
Baltimore would not specify his concerns about two papers Van Parijs wrote for Immunity while at Cal Tech, but told The Boston Globe the school has verified much of the research data.
巴尔地摩还没有明确对Van Parijs 在Cal Tech写的2篇免疫学论文的怀疑, 但学校会核查更多的研究数据.
据和讯博客Diversity Of The English World 精彩的资讯世界http://blog.hexun.com/diversity/1316232/viewarticle.html
你可以使用这个链接引用该篇文章 http://publishblog.blogchina.com/blog/tb.b?diaryID=3437958